Dressing Up Can Hurt Your Chances of Getting the Job


Traditional thinking tells us that it is safer to dress up than to dress down.  Wearing a suit and tie to an interview when only a button up is expected, is safer than wearing a polo, when a suit and tie is expected.  This kind of thinking comes from true and tried corporate culture, where success says that a well fitted suit and tie makes the best impression.  Wearing a suit and tie is considered a sign of success and power (throw in the red tie to demonstrate you are a real alpha type).  Dressing down on the other hand, such as wearing a polo and Khakies, can send the message that you are a slouch or lazy individual. Show up wearing a polo and you can send the signal that you are too laid back.

On the other hand, many of my technical peers will consider you too uptight, if you show up wearing a suit and tie. If your suit is specially well fitted and you speak in an articulate manner, but are questionable in your technical speak, you may be seen as the salesman type (developers don't have much respect for the salesmen type). If the company that you are interviewing with, expects a laid back but proficient programmer, they may expect you to wear a polo and Khakies to the interview. Anything over that, may make you seem as if you are trying too hard to get the position, thereby lacking the confidence that you need as a developer, as demonstrated by not being yourself.

So the question is "how should you dress for the interview?" Dress up or or dress down? The answer to this question is: it depends.  It depends if you are getting a job through your network or friends or not.  If you are getting the job through your network of friends you should get the information from your friends. Ask what is preferable.  In one case, where my job was coming a referral from a friend, my interview was a lunch at a sandwich shop.  If you are going in cold, run it by the hiring human resources rep.  you can ask the question as to what the interviewers prefer.  Does that mean that you are not being yourself? Of course not, it simply means that you are willing to do those things that will assure you the success you need.

Frankly, most of the developer peers, who I have the utmost respect for, could care less about your matching pants and socks and more about your skills and your ability to articulate software development terms. The truth of the matter is that even to them, appearance is important. However, dressing up is not always the safer bet.  On the flip side of that, is the sad reality that many hiring managers have no understanding of how to assess a good developer, and your apparel and other appearance is their main assessment.  

To summarize, do your homework before you decide what to wear to that interview. Dressing up is not always the safer bet.  Then again, if dressing up in suit and tie for the interview is a requirement, this can be a bad sign of what your new creative culture will be like.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Putting Files on the Rackspace File Cloud

Recently, I’ve been playing around with Asp.Net MVC and I (along with some friends) am creating an Asp.Net MVC application that can access files from our website. This means that files must display on the site as well as provide a way to download/upload them. I won’t give away all the details of the project but I will say this: Sharing photos is one of the driving forces for our project.  The files are only image type files( jpg, etc) The files must be uploaded by the users and stored somewhere within our system.  We don’t necessarily know at this time how much storage space we need but we think that we will need a little at first but possibly a lot more down the road. This means that the storage of these files must be scalable. The uploading of files must be controlled by our system.  Right off the bat we started our application and were uploading files to the web server with no problem.  We only did it this way to kind of prove our system model. We wer...
Read more

Setting Up XnaMobileUnit to run unit tests in Windows Phone 7 XNA Games

Image
Introducing XnaMobileUnit I decided to roll my own unit test framework for Windows Phone 7 XNA games.   I have a couple of reasons why I decided to roll my own.  Among them was the fact that you cannot reference regular .Net assemblies from Windows Mobile Framework.  That means that referencing NUnit was out of the question.  Also using some of the other libraries that can be used for Silverlight Applications didn't quite feel right for me. The framework that I have created, XnaMobileUnit, is very simple to use and provides all the necessary functionality to run unit tests.  I am still working on the framework to provide a few more capabilities and features, but for the most part it is ready to use out of the box.  XnaMobileUnit is open source licensed under the Apache 2.0 License and can be downloaded from http://code.google.com/p/xna-mobile-unit/ .  I recommend downloading the latest source and compiling it then referencing the new DLL. Othe...
Read more

Reasons to Stay Away from CSLA

We've been using CSLA - Component-based Scalable Logical Architecture in a product for approximately one year and while it solves quite a few problems it violates some major good practices. No Clear Separation of Layers While at the time that we chose CSLA we knew very little about domain driven design, it is no excuse for the framework to possess the data access layer within the business object. This makes it extremely difficult to separate the concerns. As a result, it is difficult to mock the data-access layer creating many problems when attempting to perform unit tests. This also puts the additional responsibility of data access on the business object class, violating the Single Responsibility Principle( SRP ). Data access layer should be totally separated from the business object period. Having the data access within the within the BO class is not the only additional responsibility placed on the class but is the most significant one I can think of. No Context Validation...
Read more